-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Effect of an Exclusive Human Milk Diet on the Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Embleton, ND, Sproat, T, Uthaya, S, Young, GR, Garg, S, Vasu, V, Masi, AC, Beck, L, Modi, N, Stewart, CJ, et al
JAMA network open. 2023;6(3):e231165
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Receipt of mother’s own breast milk (MOM) is associated with lower rates of neonatal morbidities in preterm infants and improved long-term metabolic and neurocognitive outcomes. However, many experience a shortfall in MOM supply necessitating the use of either bovine formula or pasteurised human milk. The hypothesis of this study was that gut bacterial diversity and proportions of specific bacterial taxa would differ between trial groups as part of the mechanism by which exclusive human milk diets benefits preterm infants. This study was a randomised clinical trial for which preterm infants in the first 72 hours of life (born less than 30 weeks of gestation) were recruited. Infants (n=126) were randomly assigned to standard (control) or exclusive human milk diet (intervention). Results showed that the intervention group had no overall effect on gut microbiome richness or Shannon diversity. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium relative abundance was not associated with an exclusive human milk diet. Authors conclude that their findings show that pasteurized human milk (or products derived from human milk) do not exert a major impact on gut bacteria when used in addition to MOM.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. INTERVENTIONS Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. RESULTS Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.
-
3.
Modulating the Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis Management: A Systematic Review of Current Interventions.
Tsogka, A, Kitsos, DK, Stavrogianni, K, Giannopapas, V, Chasiotis, A, Christouli, N, Tsivgoulis, G, Tzartos, JS, Giannopoulos, S
Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;12(24)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease caused by the altered immune system mistakenly attacking the central nervous system. While genetics play a leading causative role in the manifestation of this disease, other contributing environmental factors can also exist, such as a disruption in the intestinal microbial composition. Previous research has shown that the bidirectional communication between the brain's and gut's health, also known as the gut-brain axis, may contribute to the prognosis of MS. Modulating gut microbial composition can be a therapeutic strategy in MS patients to manage symptoms and prevent disease progression. This systematic review assessed different protocols for modulating gut microbial composition, including dietary modifications, probiotic use, intermittent fasting, and faecal microbial transplantation. The review included thirteen studies that compared the effects of the above gut microbial modulation intervention protocols in MS patients with healthy participants. While different dietary modification strategies improved MS symptoms, probiotic supplementations and intermittent fasting reduced inflammation, and faecal microbial transplantation showed promising positive effects in a few reports. Due to the methodological limitations of the included studies, further robust studies are required to evaluate the beneficial effects of gut microbial modulation strategies in reducing the symptoms of MS patients. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of gut microbial modulation in MS patients.
Abstract
This review attempted to explore all recent clinical studies that have investigated the clinical and autoimmune impact of gut microbiota interventions in multiple sclerosis (MS), including dietary protocols, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and intermittent fasting (IF). Methods: Thirteen studies were held between 2011 and 2023 this demonstrated interventions in gut microbiome among patients with MS and their impact the clinical parameters of the disease. These included specialized dietary interventions, the supply of probiotic mixtures, FMT, and IF. Results: Dietary interventions positively affected various aspects of MS, including relapse rates, EDSS disability scores, MS-related fatigue, and metabolic features. Probiotic mixtures showed promising results on MS-related fatigue, EDSS parameters, inflammation; meanwhile, FMT-though a limited number of studies was included-indicated some clinical improvement in similar variables. IF showed reductions in EDSS scores and significant improvement in patients' emotional statuses. Conclusions: In dietary protocols, clinical MS parameters, including relapse rate, EDSS, MFIS, FSS, and MSQoL54 scales, were significantly improved through the application of a specific diet each time. Probiotic nutritional mixtures promote a shift in inflammation towards an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with MS. The administration of such mixtures affected disability, mood levels, and quality of life among patients with MS. FMT protocols possibly demonstrate a therapeutic effect in some case reports. IF protocols were found to ameliorate EDSS and FAMS scores. All interventional means of gut microbiome modulation provided significant conclusions on several clinical aspects of MS and highlight the complexity in the relationship between MS and the gut microbiome.
-
4.
Effect of Fructooligosaccharides Supplementation on the Gut Microbiota in Human: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dou, Y, Yu, X, Luo, Y, Chen, B, Ma, D, Zhu, J
Nutrients. 2022;14(16)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fructooligosaccharide is a prebiotic fibre that undergoes fermentation in the gut, due to which it can cause gas and bloat. Additionally, this prebiotic fibre ferments to produce short-chain fatty acids, which are beneficial for the body. This systematic review and meta-analysis included eight randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of fructooligosaccharide on gut microbial composition. Short-term supplementation with fructooligosaccharide altered the gut’s microbial composition without causing any adverse effects. Bifidobacterium spp. levels were elevated in those who consumed fructooligosaccharide supplements than those who did not. Supplementation with fructooligosaccharide did not significantly change harmful bacteria such as Bacteroides and Enterobacteriaceae levels. In addition, a higher dosage of 7.5–15 g/d of fructooligosaccharide supplementation for a period of more than four weeks was found to be beneficial. Healthcare professionals can use these results to understand better how fructooligosaccharide modulates beneficial gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp. However, there is a need for more robust studies since the number of currently available studies is limited, and the exact health implications of fructooligosaccharide supplementation need to be evaluated further.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have investigated the effects of the supplementation of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on the number of bacteria in the gut that are good for health, but the results have been inconsistent. Additionally, due to its high fermentability, supplementation of FOS may be associated with adverse gastrointestinal symptoms such as bloating and flatulence. Therefore, we assessed the effects of FOS interventions on the composition of gut microbiota and gastrointestinal symptoms in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Design: All randomized controlled trials published before 10 July 2022 that investigated the effects of FOS supplementation on the human gut microbiota composition and gastrointestinal symptoms and met the selection criteria were included in this study. Using fixed or random-effects models, the means and standard deviations of the differences between the two groups before and after the intervention were combined into weighted mean differences using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies containing 213 FOS supplements and 175 controls remained in this meta-analysis. Bifidobacterium spp. counts significantly increased during FOS ingestion (0.579, 95% CI: 0.444-0.714) in comparison with that of the control group. Subgroup analysis showed greater variation in Bifidobacterium spp. in adults (0.861, 95% CI: 0.614-1.108) than in infants (0.458, 95% CI: 0.297-0.619). The increase in Bifidobacterium spp. counts were greater in the group with an intervention duration greater than 4 weeks (0.841, 95% CI: 0.436-1.247) than an intervention time less than or equal to four weeks (0.532, 95% CI: 0.370-0.694), and in the group with intervention doses > 5 g (1.116, 95% CI: 0.685-1.546) the counts were higher than those with doses ≤ 5 g (0.521, 95% CI: 0.379-0.663). No differences in effect were found between FOS intervention and comparators in regard to the abundance of other prespecified bacteria or adverse gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to explore the effect of FOS on gut microbiota and to evaluate the adverse effects of FOS intake on the gastrointestinal tract. FOS supplementation could increase the number of colonic Bifidobacterium spp. while higher dose (7.5-15 g/d) and longer duration (>4 weeks) showed more distinct effects and was well tolerated.
-
5.
Helping psoriasis from the inside out
Dr. Mark Hyman is a practicing family physician and an internationally recognised leader, speaker, educator, and advocate in the field of Functional Medicine. He is the founder and director of The UltraWellness Centre, the Head of Strategy and Innovation of the Cleveland Clinic Centre for Functional Medicine, a thirteen-time New York Times bestselling author, and Board President for Clinical Affairs for The Institute for Functional Medicine.
2022
Abstract
In this podcast episode Dr Hyman speaks to Dr Todd LePine about the various causes of psoriasis including genetics, diet, environmental factors, toxins, and streptococcus bacteria, highlighting that psoriasis is not a skin condition but rather a systemic one. They review both the conventional and functional medicine approaches to manage psoriasis, sharing interesting patient case studies and solutions that have worked which primarily centre around addressing gut health. Key functional laboratory tests to identify the root causes of psoriasis are reviewed but they highlight that it is also important to discuss stress, sleep and sun exposure with patients due to their impact on the immune system and subsequent gut integrity.
-
6.
Patti & Michael Discuss The Gut-Brain Axis (Rebroadcast)
Genova Diagnostics' podcast, The Lab Report, is focused on functional & integrative medicine, specialty laboratory diagnostics, and natural therapeutics. Join hosts Michael Chapman, ND,Patti Devers, DO, and assorted guests, as they bring their own unique style to the health & wellness discussion. It is aimed at providing the same type of educational content that Genova is well-known for, but to the larger audience of functional & integrative practitioners of all experience levels.
2021
Abstract
In this episode, Patti and Michael discuss some of the mechanisms by which this axis sends and receives those signals. They also talk about the importance of addressing both when optimizing health. The commensal bacteria in our gut and their metabolites can directly affect our memory and mood, while our brain can alter bacterial patterns and GI function. They also chat about the communication mechanisms from the GI tract to the brain, how the brain affects the gut and how to support treatment - also using Genova diagnostics functional tests. To conclude, they talk about the latest research in regards to psychobiotics and their role in influencing neurotransmitter production and, consequently, our mood.
-
7.
A Gut Feeling About Happiness - Dr. John Cryan
Dr. John Cryan, Professor & Chair, Department of Anatomy & Neuroscience, University College Cork
2019
Abstract
The impact of microbes on our happiness
-
8.
Disruption of the Gut Ecosystem by Antibiotics.
Yoon, MY, Yoon, SS
Yonsei medical journal. 2018;59(1):4-12
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem of different micro-organisms, such as bacteria, viruses and fungi, living in the human intestines. It’s involved in numerous functions, such as extracting energy and nutrition from food, protecting against disease-causing microorganisms, and supporting the immune system of the host, and therefore affecting human health and disease. This paper is a review of studies on the effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiota. It outlines how different types of antibiotics can alter the intestinal environment and the composition of the microbes, resulting in various physiological changes that can trigger disease. Relevant mechanisms, such as inflammatory response and the use of intestinal nutrients by infectious bacteria are discussed. Finally, it discusses faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and probiotics as treatment approaches, aimed at restoring a disturbed intestinal environment.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota is a complex ecosystem consisting of various microorganisms that expands human genetic repertoire and therefore affects human health and disease. The metabolic processes and signal transduction pathways of the host and intestinal microorganisms are intimately linked, and abnormal progression of each process leads to changes in the intestinal environment. Alterations in microbial communities lead to changes in functional structures based on the metabolites produced in the gut, and these environmental changes result in various bacterial infections and chronic enteric inflammatory diseases. Here, we illustrate how antibiotics are associated with an increased risk of antibiotic-associated diseases by driving intestinal environment changes that favor the proliferation and virulence of pathogens. Understanding the pathogenesis caused by antibiotics would be a crucial key to the treatment of antibiotic-associated diseases by mitigating changes in the intestinal environment and restoring it to its original state.
-
9.
Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs.
Qin, Y, Wade, PA
Journal of biochemistry. 2018;163(2):105-112
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Trillions of microbes live symbiotically in and on an individual human being, most of them inside the digestive tract and communally known as the gut microbiome. The gut microbiome plays a vital role in the individual host’s health, not only by helping digest food and harvest energy, but also by regulating immune development and influencing gene expression. Diet and factors, such as infections and the use of antibiotics, can alter the balance of the microbiome and lead to various outcomes. This paper reviewed the current understanding of the ways in which the gut microbiome is capable of altering the host’s gene expression through microbial signals, including metabolites, bile acids, inflammation and altered composition. The studies highlighted in the paper show that gut microbes communicate both with local cells in the intestines and with more distant organs, such as the liver and the cardiovascular system. Through this communication, they can regulate the expression of immune cells, cancer cells, enzymes and inflammation-related molecules. The authors concluded that these interactions, or the crosstalk between the microbes and the host, demonstrate a crucial role of the gut microbiome in the host’s response to environmental signals. However, many of the mechanisms are still unclear, so further studies are needed to explain specific microbe-derived signals, affecting host gene expression, and to deepen our understanding of how lifestyle, health status and environmental exposures, such as antibiotics, regulate the microbiome and its influence.
Abstract
Mammals exist in a complicated symbiotic relationship with their gut microbiome, which is postulated to have broad impacts on host health and disease. As omics-based technologies have matured, the potential mechanisms by which the microbiome affects host physiology are being addressed. The gut microbiome, which provides environmental cues, can modify host cell responses to stimuli through alterations in the host epigenome and, ultimately, gene expression. Increasing evidence highlights microbial generation of bioactive compounds that impact the transcriptional machinery in host cells. Here, we review current understanding of the crosstalk between gut microbiota and the host epigenome, including DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs. These studies are providing insights into how the host responds to microbial signalling and are predicted to provide information for the application of precision medicine.
-
10.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.